<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Adds Editing Tools to Online Translation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekytips.net/google-adds-editing-tools-to-online-translation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekytips.net/google-adds-editing-tools-to-online-translation/</link>
	<description>All about Computer &#38; Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:37:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://geekytips.net/google-adds-editing-tools-to-online-translation/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekytips.net/google-adds-editing-tools-to-online-translation/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>So google gets smarter with the help of the Internet? Smart enough. I have noticed google translate has become better for some language pairs but then it goes bad again and then it is again good. Statistical method is what most use nowadays but other companies combine different methods to achieve good results like Interlecta for example, http://home.interlecta.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So google gets smarter with the help of the Internet? Smart enough. I have noticed google translate has become better for some language pairs but then it goes bad again and then it is again good. Statistical method is what most use nowadays but other companies combine different methods to achieve good results like Interlecta for example, <a href="http://home.interlecta.com" rel="nofollow">http://home.interlecta.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

